Sabotage, racism or just nonsense? – Red State

As I reported Sunday, the preliminary list of candidates for the Sept. 14 Gavin Newsom Recall election was posted on the California Secretary of State’s website, and the name of a political pundit, radio personality and late-accession candidate for Governor Larry Elder was added. not mentioned. I stated that this was not the final list and that no information was revealed as to why his exclusion, but if things were not cleared up sufficiently, it could mean the end of his campaign.

We soon discovered the WHY: Democratic “shenanigans” as Larry Elder called them. Secretary of State Shirley Weber, who happened to be appointed by Newsom, decided that because Elder’s tax returns didn’t match, she could disqualify him from the vote. Weber sent a letter to Elder’s campaign on Sunday afternoon, even though the news that he hadn’t made it to the vote was already popular Saturday night!

Did I tell you that Shirley Weber has been appointed? Her movements reflect the bidding of her masters. Elder mentioned this in a lengthy tweet thread Monday:

Shortly after, they shared the letter to my campaign manager with the media. Our attorneys tell us that no candidate has ever been disqualified for editing issues with income tax returns before.

The California Globe spoke to attorney Mark Meuser and confirmed this. Meuser also reported that Weber was not authorized to exclude Elder from the vote for this reason:

California Secretary of State Shirley Weber on Saturday released the official state list of the 41 candidates who filed the required paperwork to participate in the Sept. 14 recall election. was conspicuously absent Larry Elder‘s name, the Globe reported Monday.

The Globe contacted election attorney Mark Meuser on Monday about the letter Larry Elder (below) received from Secretary of State Weber. Meuser called: California Election Code 8903, Section (b), and indicated that the statute on tax returns says that the secretary of state can prepare a new version of the tax return with only the redactions allowed by that subsection, but cannot remove a candidate.

Elder went on to lay out the facts confirmed by Meuser above and concluded his thread:

If the decision of the State Secretary is not reversed, we will see them in court. -Larry Elder

Elder went to court, and the judge ruled on Wednesday that Elder should not have been required to file his tax returns in the first place, as the law used by the Secretary of State to exclude him only applied to primary elections, and not on a special vote like this recall.

But I’m sure our affirmative action Secy of State knew this. When the news broke of Elder’s victory over the “shenanigans,” my colleague Brandon Morse wrote:

Elder’s inclusion in the race will be troubling for Democrats looking to maintain their power over the state. His status as a high-profile Republican could give voters a big boost to vote yes to the recall, leaving Democrats further behind than they already are.

So, as for Elder’s fight to get on the ballot, was it a Republican thing, an incompetence thing, or a racing thing?

Lavern Spicer went there and played the race card.

Others also raised this possibility:

In Elder’s case, it might be a combination of all three. The Democratic Party is based on racism and remains racist. Want to talk about implicit bias? Look no further than the way blacks within that party are beaten up, but rarely gain real influence. And once blacks have been used to achieve a certain goal (First black president, “Check!”), like grasshoppers, they move to the next fertile field (watch out, Hispanics and Asians).

Then you have the tired saw of how the Democratic Party treats black conservatives and Republicans as non-persons and racial traitors. Elder made a movie about that called Uncle Tom, and you hear the stories of me, Jeff Charles, Kira Davis, Christopher Arps and others; so there is no need to elaborate on that point here.

Elder’s exclusion from the California Recall election ballot may have been a trifle in their minds to single out the least able campaigner. The Democrats seemed unprepared for Elder’s rapid pushback, and it may have done the opposite of what they intended.

Now there’s an even bigger spotlight on this Recall election, and they now have a candidate with a massive media, public relations and legal base at their disposal should more nonsense follow. And with less than 55 days until the September 14 Recall election, you know they’ll be there.

Major Williams, another charismatic black candidate on the ballot, also came across what he believes to be sabotage. Williams has been campaigning as a candidate for California governor since early 2021 and has raised significant social media presence and campaign funds. So it came as a surprise to his followers that his name was also banned from the Recall election vote.

There has been a lot of speculation and questions about his campaign, and these increased when he failed the vote. Williams responded with a rather profound Facebook post:

He also posted this video on Instagram, who said in part:

As a candidate, my job is to enable the right people around me to perform based on the roles they are paid for. In this particular case, my admin didn’t do the work that needed to be done, based on what they were paid for.

Williams weaves a story about how he was locked out of all his accounts, and that this administrator also failed to submit the proper documents in time to put his name on the Sept. 14 Recall ballot.

Williams has filed a lawsuit against those he identified as the saboteurs who contributed to his campaign woes, and is now encouraging his followers to make him a candidate.

Williams brought in the shoe leather campaign and genuinely connected with people; so some of the comments on both the Facebook and Instagram posts were a support and encouragement for him to continue fighting.

Then there are ones like the Twitter reply above, and others, like this former follower on Facebook:

With so many others who made it to the vote, it really amazes me that those who haven’t have this victim mentality. I understand that Elder’s tax returns were incomplete. However, he came into the race just a week ago and was clearly in a hurry. How come a candidate who entered the recall race from day one could not meet the requirements to vote? I sincerely ask as someone who has (at one point) supported this campaign. It’s like applying for another job and submitting an incomplete resume/application, and then getting mad if you don’t get hired. Responsibility folks, come on! This has absolutely nothing to do with ‘evil’, and everything to do with not respecting/understanding timelines, and the importance of complete submissions

And there you have it.

Louis Pasteur is quoted as saying, “Fortune is favorable to the prepared mind.”

Whether it’s sabotage, racist tendencies or just plain craziness, the prepared mind and the truly prepared candidate overcome them. Elder came out on top and received a massive boost to his campaign, and a California Politics/Emerson opinion poll even has him in charge; but now is not the time to get cocky. If elder remains unprepared and starts thinking 10 steps ahead, the next skirmish may be the one who destroys his candidacy.

It may already be too late for Williams.



Source link

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*